Critical Parameters in Wave Solder Optimization

Production and process engineers have learned new insights to board-wave interaction, leading to dramatic changes in wave solder procedures. This has emerged only in the last several years, when technology was introduced which could directly measure your board's experience in your solder wave. Immediate and sharp improvements in board quality have been the result, propelling widespread acquisition of such technology.

This article discusses concepts of board-wave measurement and reports study results that employed commercially available technology to measure and respond to the key parameters of wave soldering. The purpose of the study was to determine the importance of dwell time and immersion depth measurement in wave solder quality.

Centrality of Board-Wave Interaction

Your wave machine was built for only one purpose: To cause your boards to interact with your solder wave. You know this to be completely true; because when you look in your reflow oven you see no wave. In the reflow oven, chemistry supports your boards as they experience temperatures. However, this is not true for wave soldering.

In your wave machine, chemistry and temperatures are only supporting actors as they deliver your boards to your solder wave. That is why your process window for temperatures in a wave machine is wide and forgiving in comparison to that of the surface mount oven, and why precise control of your board-wave interaction produces such large benefits.

Your leads are in the solder wave for only a few seconds or less. Soldering is supposed to be achieved in a single pass and emerge defect-free. Since this event is so brief and today's boards are so complex, your board must pass through your wave with precision. Thoughtful engineers have learned that seemingly slight board-wave process variations can cause large quality variations.

Limitations of Thermal Profiling

Many continue to adhere to the notion that wave solder process control is primarily about temperatures, and therefore choose to rely strictly on temperature stickers, pyrometers or thermal profiling. While temperatures are important, they do not and cannot by their very nature address your boards interaction with your solder wave.

Wave soldering without accurate board-wave data is a sure prescription for consistent defects, production crises and downtime. Experientially, production professionals understand this - they see the rework staff at their workstations and bear the brunt of management's goals for throughput and quality.

This is true despite Herculean efforts in thermal profiling management, wonderful progress in wave solder machine quality, and the continuous development of flux and solders chemistries. Yet ask a manufacturing engineer from where the majority of his assembly defects come and more often than not hell point to his wave machines.

So, legions of rework staff work every day, every shift, solely to correct defects off the production line. Rather than being viewed as compensatory activity for production failures and therefore something to be exorcised, current levels of rework are often deemed acceptable as part of the production process itself. The net result, as we shall see here, is significant exaggeration of production costs and serious under performance in wave soldering.

For example, adjusting your pre heaters can never eliminate bridging caused by too long a dwell. Likewise for skipping caused by too shallow an immersion depth. The study results presented here show that the majority of existing wave soldering defects can only be eliminated through accurate, direct measurement and control of your board interaction with the wave.

Article Directory: http://www.everyonesarticles.com

The article is written on the information the author got from www.swpc.co.il. The information the author got from here was good and true enough on each and every aspect of the technology discussed above. As the author has been dealing in the manufacturing of PCB's on large scale.

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated